design autobiography

i'm never caught without earrings [and coral is my favorite color]

i definitely want to go back to sydney

it doesn't get much better than natural light

fallingwater [amazing!]

citrus fruits [great taste and colors]

blandwood mansion [historic buildings in general]

venice [city of floating stone]

curves [graceful, elegant]

absolutely love the beach [relaxed, laid-back feeling]

i usually would rather have thunderstorms than a sunny day

final [drafting] portfolio

...coming full circle...

As designers get more creative and pull from new resources, INNOVATION is something to strive for. In my sacred space, I used copper walls, molded bamboo furniture, and movable louvers to set my design apart from others. “Botta has added a primal imagery that makes his buildings look very old and yet very new” (Roth 587). This is a hard thing to do, but it is something that can be achieved through innovation and forward thinking. This is what I hope to do in the future. My dream job is to design new houses with the old feel and character, but with a twist. Putting a new spin on old ideas, bringing something new to the table is what innovation is all about.



In my eyes, AUTHENTICITY is achieved in design that has strong roots. “Architecture is conceived of as a collective public entity, built up over time, continuing a dialogue with the past in the present” (Roth 593). I think this speaks to the authenticity of an object, building, or place. Like the nautilus shell, we carry the history of design along with us. This authenticity stems from designers recognizing this fact and taking that into consideration when formulating a design. They pay homage to the past in some way while also moving forward “not simply alluding in obvious ways to adjoining buildings, but by making a multilayered connection to a more encompassing history” (Roth 596).



When designing, it is important to consider the COMMUNITY around it. It is also necessary to consider the types and volumes of people using the space. It is about “creating environments for groups of people, living and working together in ancestral traditional ways” (Roth 607). For our final project in studio, we designed a sacred space for the graduate students. I created an area that could accommodate multiple students, but they could also get privacy in another area. Although it seems we have gotten away from catering to specific functions with our architecture, I think good design has to respond to the surroundings and intended use of the space in some way.

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/184/385290925_8306d2c683_b.jpg

STEWARDSHIP means protecting and caring for places or property. With the threat of global warming and environmental pollution, designers are striving to protect and care for the earth as a whole. Ken Yeang’s Menara Mesiniaga and Malayan Borneo Finance Building in Malaysia are examples of being a good steward for the environment. The open areas allow for easy air circulation throughout the building. The deep recesses in apartment terraces provide shade from the sun (Roth 609). Both buildings respond to the environments, which puts them on the path to more efficient and sustainable design. As we move further into the 20th century and environmental problems, it is more important to develop sustainable design.

This week (and semester) has been about discovering who I am as a designer. I know that I am interested in historic preservation, but how can I use what I’ve learned in these classes to further that exploration and create a unique niche in the world of design. I like older buildings so much because I’ve found, especially through this class, that everything can be traced back to something before it. I also love the fact that no matter how many years pass since antiquity, that period and its architecture will never be forgotten. Designers still reference qualities of ancient architecture. I hope to create timeless designs that are viewed in much the same way.


Roth, Leland M. (2007). Understanding Architecture: Its Elements, History, and Meaning. Boulder, CO: Westview Press

[pair]ing down

Every building has some sort of conversation, whether it is a MONOLOGUE or DIALOGUE. Architecture takes multiple elements from a variety of places. Hans Scharoun’s Schminke House has a noticeable dialogue with the buildings of Gropius and Mies van der Rohe. It uses the same materials as Gropius and Mies van der Rohe, but has more energy. Sharp angular forms connect it with the dynamics of Expressionism (Roth 537). With the precedent analysis, the dialogue my building has with the HSB turning torso is best understood when considering the intention of the architects: to create a unique skyline. While these two buildings have a dialogue on one level, my building has a different dialogue with the surrounding skyline, and yet another conversation within itself.



Is it possible for a space to hold two opposing conversations simultaneously? This is the struggle I have with my Sacred Space design. I want to find ways to seamlessly integrate areas of CELEBRATION and MEDITATION into a cohesive whole. Aalto had some success with the library for Mount Angel Benedictine Abbey. The furniture is all wood, black leather upholstery on grey carpet. The color is meant to come from the books (Roth 547). This could be seen as a complete celebration of the purpose of the library – the books. Yet it is also a meditation. The neutral tones keep the energy subdued and restful, which is important in libraries. The effect of celebration vs. meditation can vary based on interpretation, time of day, or by looking at different elements within the room.



The rise of interior designers meant a change in what was ‘good taste’ in home decoration. Interior designers have a way JUXTAPOSING different elements to TRANSPOSE a space. The highly decorative, sometimes cluttered, Victorian features of the past were stripped away. Interiors were transposed to a simpler, cleaner, elegant look (Massey 127). This new style also involved the juxtaposition of dissimilar elements, such as a bold check curtain with a hand-painted wallpaper. Good designers can put elements together in unconventional ways that are still aesthetically pleasing. Surrealist painters “attempted to illustrate the threatening world of the subconscious in their paintings, most often by juxtaposing incongruous elements within the picture-frame to startle the viewer and undermine everyday expectations” (Massey 135). My goal as a designer is to take this same approach. In my sacred space, I have found a way to use marble, bamboo, and copper together in new ways to create a unique room.


In any design, LIGHT and SHADOW are important. Syrie Maugham’s signature was the ‘All White’ interior. She was successful with using shades of white and neutral tones to fill a room in a way that was still interesting. Richard Meier has similar success with his buildings, which were often all white. Yet there was simplicity and a play with light that was intriguing and immensely successful, such as at the Douglas House and the High Art Museum. The significance of the use of white and light in both of these cases is that light seems to represent something new, almost divine. The interesting thing is that Notre-Dame-du-Haut, white materials were used as well, but the emphasis was on shadow on the interior. Throughout history, designers have continued to explore the relationship between light and shadow.



One thing our teachers in studio have beaten into our heads is move away from the LITERAL! Get more ABSTRACT! I have found it easier to take inspiration and abstract it to get ideas for a design. It is helpful to start with the literal interpretation, but eventually this can limit the design and thought process. It is hard to push a design further without thinking deeper. In the image above, I created a pattern by painting around the edges of a leaf. However, sometimes literal is where the design stops. Michael Graves’ design of the Team Disney Building features actual caryatids of the seven dwarves. Instead of trying to convey the essence of Disney, he represented it literally. Salvador Dali took the same approach when designing the ‘Mae West’s Lips’ sofa. These designs communicate in a more straightforward way.

This week is about the voice that architecture has. The story or conversation it has with viewers and other buildings around it. Mario Botta recognized “…a need for architecture to speak once again to people, to become ‘presence’ once again…. a need to reestablish a partnership with people after decades in which architecture was so antiseptic, distant..” (Roth 567). These words get back to the idea of an architecture parlent. All architecture has a voice, an idea it conveys, an emotion it evokes. The words this week remind us of that.

action verbs...

When we view architecture, we usually SPECULATE about concepts, what’s the purpose/idea behind the design. We may not know the designers thoughts, but from the architecture itself, we can speculate about the original thought process. This is what we are doing with the precedent analysis. Thinking about how that building relates to the context and the experience of the designers. Some designers make it easy to interpret the design because they had a clear, strong concept to start with. Architecture is made to challenge the norms and to make you think. The works of certain designers are considered modern because they were ahead of the times. Le Corbusier felt that "it is a question of building which is at the root of social unrest today: architecture or revolution" (Roth 530). They forced people to rethink the rules of design and to think about what’s possible.

http://www.dallassky.com/FP1.jpg

To encourage speculation, a space has to have a certain energy that draws people in. Designers employ a variety of techniques to ENERGIZE the space, product, etc. At Fountain Place, the architect used angled sides and a classic tapering ‘wu-wu’ construction to bring energy to the building. Not only is energy created in the building with the oddly shaped floors and angled windows, the city of Dallas itself is energized with the addition of this building to the skyline. The fact that he outside is all reflective glass indicates that a common way to energize architecture is with natural light. Alexander Girard used natural light wherever possible to provide a natural element within his spaces (Massey 150). At the Postal Savings Bank, Wagner brings energy to all the floors through a skylight and glass block floors that filter natural light through all the floors.



We SHAPE ideas, concepts, furniture, and perceptions (among other things). We posses the ability to craft things into what we want them to be. Charles and Ray Eames used a new technique to mold plywood in unconventional ways. The result was the famous Eames chairs that were like nothing else. The same can be said of a lot of modern furniture designs. “New techniques for moulding and glueing plywood had been discovered by American manufacturers during wartime production for the navy and were now exploited for furniture design, as were plastics with fibre-glass reinforcements” (Massey 155). Molded woods and plastics bring a new fluid aesthetic that is unprecedented. The mark of a good designer is to use already available and cmmon materials to create something unique and interesting. One of the reasons I like Fountain Place and the HSB Turning Torso so much is that they use glass, steel, and aluminum to create works like no other.



The way a design or presentation is COMPOSED reflects the original driving concept of the work. Every detail is important and works together to convey an overall idea. A musical composition involves the juxtaposition and layering of parts to create a harmonious whole. This definition of composition carries across disciplines. Designers must take into account the qualities of the individual parts and integrate them into a seamless whole. The Eames’s home “was constructed from industrial components.. that provided an appropriately Modern setting forth their furniture-designs” (Massey 156). Everything from the steel joints and decking kept with the Modern aesthetic. The TWA Terminal is also a great example. Saarinen took everything into account to express the idea of flight. Every single thing, down to the handrails, has a form that speaks to the idea of flight in some way. These parts flow into one another to create a well-integrated design. My goal is to do the same thing in my ‘sacred space’ project.

freepages.history.rootsweb.ancestry.com

Designers are constantly STRETCHING the limits and thinking outside the box. This is the only way to advance. With the changing times and urbanization, there has been a consistent stretching upwards as skyscrapers become the norm. In some areas, the stretching outward of the prairie and ranch houses provides different emphasis on being connected with the land and staying grounded. There has also been a stretching outward across nations. Movements like the Pop, Modern, International styles are spreading internationally. Modernism became "the appropriate progressive image for multinational corporations" (Massey 145). Designers are no longer reaching backward, but reaching laterally within the same time period to different locations. This brings more similarity across nations, rather than distinctions between regions as in antiquity. The result is more international integration of design.

Overall, this week was about how designs and concepts are formulated. Designers have a clear idea of what they want to convey and how they want the viewer to react. A lot of the modern architecture pushes boundaries and forces us to rethink everything we thought we knew about design. Thinking and speculating is the only way to learn and move forward into the future.


Massey, Anne. (1990). Interior Design of the 20th Century. London: Thames & Hudson

Roth, Leland M. (2007). Understanding Architecture: Its Elements, History, and Meaning. Boulder, CO: Westview Press

unit summary [reflections]

The reflections unit was about deciding the best way to move into the future. Do we continue to recreate the past or do we completely move away from that in new ways? This unit saw designers choosing either of the directions; some used a combination of both. The rapidly changing times of the 18th and 19th centuries were a double-edged sword. Many designers took advantage of the forward thinking innovative atmosphere and pushed into the future in unprecedented ways. However, when things change too fast, it is natural to feel uncomfortable and to revert to what is familiar. These types of designers use forms and techniques they already knew.

An important part of this unit was getting back to the roots. You have to know where you came from to get to where you’re going. Frank Lloyd Wright conveyed this with the design of his personal home. It went back to the basics as far as composition is concerned. The façade features a steep triangular roof, bands of windows, and a door. Wright finds ways to connect with roots with many of his other designs. For example, at Fallingwater, he connects with nature and the surroundings by using local stone and building directly into the landscape. The same is true with other designers. A reconnection with nature seems to be a recurring idea. Designers pay attention special moments within nature and use those as inspiration for elements within their designs.

At the time of our nations formation, there was a struggle establishing an identity and developing a unique architecture. Designers worked hard to change European forms and styles to reflect who we were as a nation. An example is the Trinity Church of Boston, The Romanesque-inspired style used in this building soon became a unique American style used for civic buildings throughout the country. The most successful styles, such as Art Deco over the International Style, caught on because they were adaptable and they reflected the existing architecture.

When thinking about the reflections unit, it is also helpful to think about the word literally as well. With the new technology of mass production, glass and iron became heavily used in new buildings. Glass was no longer an exclusive material, but something that could be used frequently. The glass represented a new era, looking back the past but also moving to the future.

[road trip]

Designers have to consider MATERIALITY when designing a space, product, furniture, or anything. The materials can limit the design or take it to the next level. We did material boards exploring the cost, benefits, disadvantages and uses of various materials. Each one has unique qualities that convey different feelings and fit into different designs. French art deco designers “used only the rarest of materials, including lizard skin, shagreen, ivory, tortoiseshell, and exotic woods” (Massey 94). These materials add to the exclusive, high-quality feeling of their work. Using more common materials might have suggested a more relaxed and lower-class feeling than they intended. The materials used say a lot about intentions of the designer, but can also speak to the context of the design.



Wright used local stone in Fallingwater. The landscape was the ROOT of the design, both physically and conceptually. The idea for a design can come from the past, the immediate context, or a variety of other sources. Just as the roots provide life to a tree, these sources of inspiration bring life to a building, a piece of furniture, or a painting. They affects the way a design is approaches, the elements that are within it, and how others interpret the design. These roots are the basis for everything else. The Art Deco movement had some roots in the ancient Egyptians. “The [sunrise] motif was probably derived from ancient Egyptian art, a popular source of inspiration…” (Massey 94). The use of the sunrise motif speaks to what the designers thought was important and how they related to antiquity. Architecture has “silently expressed how humans view themselves in relation to the cosmos, to their gods, and to each other” (Roth 519).



After studying numerous works of architecture, I find it easier to notice similarities between separate entities and how parts fit appropriately together within a whole. The planning of Fallingwater reflects CONGRUENCE with the context of the work. It is built from local stone, as well as being molded to fit into the landscape rather than changing the landscape. Fallingwater also has a special congruence with Walter Gropius’ Fagus Factory. At the factory, “the corners are not solid masses but the merging of transparent glass panes” (Roth 522). Wright follows this same idea in the window tower running between floors. As I though more about the idea of virtually eliminating a corner, I thought about the critique room in Gatewood. The corners of that room also feature windows coming together. Similarities can be found throughout time periods and building types.



CONCEPTS begin to emerge as we look as similarities between elements of a space. Concepts can only be successfully expressed when all elements are working together to reflect that main idea. Wright micromanaged everything detail at Fallingwater to ensure that his concept of an open, free-flowing natural environment was being conveyed. Sometimes the concept is not as successfully expressed. “The curious irony in the German Pavillion, designed as it was to demonstrate the ideals of achievement of German industry, was that it was painstakingly handmade” (Roth 528). Mies van der Rohe intended for the concept of showing industry and the importance of mass production, yet the parts had to be assembled by hand. So it seems that the real statement is that both machine and man are needed to create great works of architecture.



After visiting Fallingwater and Monticello, I noticed that although both had vastly different overall feels and concepts, both utilized the idea of COMPRESSION and RELEASE. Jefferson achieved this in his personal area with an alcove bed opening into a room with a high ceiling and a skylight. The compression and release was seen through the opening up of space, but also with the contrast of light between the areas. The same was true in Fallingwater. The narrow dark hallways led to rooms with a lot of window and light. This compression and release of light and space adds to the dynamics of these buildings. My goal was to achieve the same effect in my Light Habitat project.


Overall, this week is about bringing elements together to formulate concepts. My observations at Monticello and Fallingwater really got me thinking about how designers achieve this because both are successful in different ways. Even though the ideas, functions, or even forms between buildings are different, there are still a vast number of ways to make connections.


Massey, Anne. (1990). Interior Design of the 20th Century. London: Thames & Hudson

Roth, Leland M. (2007). Understanding Architecture: Its Elements, History, and Meaning. Boulder, CO: Westview Press